Fluid Power World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Hydraulics
      • Cylinders & Actuators
      • Filtration/Contamination Control
      • Fittings, Couplings & Adapters
      • Fluids
      • Fluid Conditioning
      • Hose & Tubing
      • Pumps & Motors
      • Related Technologies
      • Sealing
      • Sensors & Gauges
      • Valves & Manifolds
    • Pneumatics
      • Air Preparation & Regulation
      • Compressed Air Technologies
      • Cylinders & Actuators
      • End Effectors & Grippers
      • Fittings, Couplings & Adapters
      • Hose & Tubing
      • Sensors
      • Vacuum
      • Valves & Manifolds
  • Engineering Basics
  • Trending
  • Resources
    • Digital Issues
    • Pneumatics Tech Toolbox
    • Podcasts
    • Subscribe to Fluid Power World Print Magazine
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • White Papers
  • Women in Engineering
    • Women in Fluid Power
    • Women in Engineering
  • Design Guide Library
  • Classrooms
    • Pneumatics Classroom
  • SUBSCRIBE

How can you achieve cylinder flow reduction?

By Paul Heney | January 8, 2021

Share

Looking for ways to further reduce your compressed air demand?  Consider investigating air cylinder actuation.

Often times, air cylinders in production machinery only require significant force during a single power stroke, but still use full line pressure to return the cylinder to resting position.  Let’s compare the air consumption for double acting versus a spring return cylinder.

Figure 1. Using spring return eliminates the compressed air required for cylinder retract stroke. (Source: Parker Hannifin Corp.)

Consider an example double acting air cylinder with an internal swept volume of one cubic foot. To move the cylinder from resting position (at 0 psig) to the end of the stroke and fill it to 100 psi would consume about 6.9 cubic feet of compressed air.  To move it back to resting position the compressed air for the power stroke is blown off through an exhaust, and the other side of the cylinder pressurized to 100 psi to return it, consuming another 6.9 cubic feet of compressed air (minus the volume of the rod).

Use of the same volume cylinder with spring return would reduce the compressed air consumption by about 50% because no compressed air would be required for the retract stroke.

Some other ways to reduce cylinder consumption:

  • Reduce power stroke pressure – Often, the power stroke will not need 100 psi. Every 14.5 psi reduction reduces one volume of compressed air for the stroke, so using a reduced regulated pressure can save compressed air.
  • Use reduced retract pressure – If spring return is not possible, reducing the retract stroke pressure will reduce the compressed air consumption per stroke by one volume for every 14.5 psi. Often very little force is required to retract cylinders.
  • Use gravity – Sometimes cylinders lift against gravity, the force of gravity can sometimes be used to provide the force for the retract stroke.

 

 


Filed Under: Cylinders & Actuators, Pneumatic Tips

 

About The Author

Paul Heney

Current Digital Issue

  Easier access to more of our content Every other month, readers of Fluid Power World have access to our beautiful print and digital editions, where we share a selection of the best fundamentals content, technology news, case studies, and technical articles that cover the gamut of hydraulics and pneumatics system design. But we only…

Subscribe!

Fluid Power World is written by engineers for engineers engaged in designing machines and or equipment in Off-Highway, Oil & Gas, Mining, Packaging, Industrial Applications, Agriculture, Construction, Forestry, Medical and Material Handling. Fluid Power World covers pneumatics, mobile hydraulics and industrial hydraulics.

Fluid Power Design Guides

fluid
“fpw
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Fluid Power Professionals.

RSS Featured White Papers

  • Moving fluid power forward
  • High-force linear motion: How to convert from hydraulic cylinders to electric actuators and why.
  • A technical comparison: Performance of pneumatic cylinders and electric rod actuators
Fluid Power World
  • Hose Assembly Tips
  • Mobile Hydraulic Tips
  • Pneumatic Tips
  • Sealing & Contamination Control Tips
  • About us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Fluid Power World

  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Hydraulics
      • Cylinders & Actuators
      • Filtration/Contamination Control
      • Fittings, Couplings & Adapters
      • Fluids
      • Fluid Conditioning
      • Hose & Tubing
      • Pumps & Motors
      • Related Technologies
      • Sealing
      • Sensors & Gauges
      • Valves & Manifolds
    • Pneumatics
      • Air Preparation & Regulation
      • Compressed Air Technologies
      • Cylinders & Actuators
      • End Effectors & Grippers
      • Fittings, Couplings & Adapters
      • Hose & Tubing
      • Sensors
      • Vacuum
      • Valves & Manifolds
  • Engineering Basics
  • Trending
  • Resources
    • Digital Issues
    • Pneumatics Tech Toolbox
    • Podcasts
    • Subscribe to Fluid Power World Print Magazine
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • White Papers
  • Women in Engineering
    • Women in Fluid Power
    • Women in Engineering
  • Design Guide Library
  • Classrooms
    • Pneumatics Classroom
  • SUBSCRIBE